View Comments The Ottomans had a strong cultural and political presence over the Middle East, North Africa and South Eastern Europe the Balkans from the fifteenth century onwards until the late eighteenth century. They managed to rule over an ethnically diverse and multi-religious population, consisting of Arabs, Serbs, Bulgars, Crimean Russians, etc. Compared with the Romans and the Byzantines, who had also spread and dominated the vast Mediterranean region in the past, the Ottomans are less well-known or studied in the West. Today, there is debate and mystery concerning how the Ottomans managed to hold together those various subjects peacefully and with amazing harmony for such a long time. Some modern Western scholars would ascribe the long-lasting existence of Ottoman rule to oppression and a strong military presence. According to this view, it was fear and terror that brought authority and control over at least the Balkans, a dominantly Christian territory.

Author:Sagore Daran
Language:English (Spanish)
Published (Last):16 January 2009
PDF File Size:8.16 Mb
ePub File Size:13.51 Mb
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

His letters provide important foreign accounts of the Ottoman state. Because Busbecq was trying to bring about reform at home, he did not dwell on the very real problems with Ottoman government. At Buda I made my first acquaintance with the Janissaries; this is the name by which the Turks call the infantry of the royal guard. The Turkish state has 12, of these troops when the corps is at its full strength. They are scattered through every part of the empire, either to garrison the forts against the enemy, or to protect the Christians and Jews from the violence of the mob.

There is no district with any considerable amount of population, no borough or city, which has not a detachment of Janissaries to protect the Christians, Jews, and other helpless people from outrage and wrong. A garrison of Janissaries is always stationed in the citadel of Buda. The dress of these men consists of a robe reaching down to the ankles, while, to cover their heads, they employ a cowl which, by their account, was originally a cloak sleeve, part of which contains the head, while the remainder hangs down and flaps against the neck.

On their forehead is placed a silver gilt cone of considerable height, studded with stones of no great value. These Janissaries generally came to me in pairs. When they were admitted to my dining room they first made a bow, and then came quickly up to me, all but running, and touched my dress or hand, as if they intended to kiss it.

After reaching the door, they would stand respectfully with their arms crossed, and their eyes bent on the ground, looking more like monks than warriors.

On receiving a few small coins which was what they wanted they bowed again, thanked me in loud tones, and went off blessing me for my kindness. To tell you the truth, if I had not been told beforehand that they were Janissaries, I should, without hesitation, have taken them for members of some order of Turkish monks, or brethren of some Moslem college.

Yet these are the famous Janissaries, whose approach inspires terror everywhere. These mules and camels also serve to carry tents and armour, and likewise tools and munitions for the campaign. The invading army carefully abstains from encroaching on its magazines at the outset; as they are well aware that when the season for campaigning draws to a close, they will have to retreat over districts wasted by the enemy, or scraped bare by countless hordes of men and droves of hungry animals, as if they had been devastated by locusts; accordingly they reserve their stores as much as possible for this emergency.

The rest of the army is badly off, unless they have provided some supplies at their own expense. On such occasions they take out a few spoonfuls of flour and put them into water, adding some butter, and seasoning the mess with salt and spices; these ingredients are boiled, and a large bowl of gruel is thus obtained.

Of this they eat once or twice a day, according to the quantity they have, without any bread, unless they have brought some biscuit with them Sometimes they have recourse to horseflesh; dead horses are of course plentiful in their great hosts, and such beasts as are in good condition when they die furnish a meal not to be despised by famished soldiers.

What a contrast to our men! Christian soldiers on a campaign refuse to put up with their ordinary food, and call for thrushes, becaficos [a small bird esteemed a dainty, as it feeds on figs and grapes], and suchlike dainty dishes! It makes me shudder to think of what the result of a struggle between such different systems must be; one of us must prevail and the other be destroyed, at any rate we cannot both exist ]in safety.

On their side is the vast wealth of their empire, unimpaired resources, experience and practice in arms, a veteran soldiery, an uninterrupted series of victories, readiness to endure hardships, union, order, discipline, thrift and watchfulness.

On ours are found an empty exchequer, luxurious habits, exhausted resources, broken spirits, a raw and insubordinate soldiery, and greedy quarrels; there is no regard for discipline, license runs riot, the men indulge in drunkenness and debauchery, and worst of all, the enemy are accustomed to victory, we to defeat. Can we doubt what the result must be? The only obstacle is Persia, whose position on his rear forces the invader to take precautions.

The fear of Persia gives us a respite, but it is only for a time. No distinction is attached to birth among the Turks; the deference to be paid to a man is measured by the position he holds in the public service. In making his appointments the Sultan pays no regard to any pretensions on the score of wealth or rank, nor does he take into consideration recommendations or popularity, he considers each case on its own merits, and examines carefully into the character, ability, and disposition of the man whose promotion is in question.

It is by merit that men rise in the service, a system which ensures that posts should only be assigned to the competent. Each man in Turkey carries in his own hand his ancestry and his position in life, which he may make or mar as he will. Among the Turks, therefore, honours, high posts, and judgeships are the rewards of great ability and good service. If a man be dishonest, or lazy, or careless, he remains at the bottom of the ladder, an object of contempt; for such qualities there are no honours in Turkey!

This is the reason that they are successful in their undertakings, that they lord it over others, and are daily extending the bounds of their empire. These are not our ideas, with us there is no opening left for merit; birth is the standard for everything; the prestige of birth is the sole key to advancement in the public service.

Source: From C. Forster and F. Daniel, eds. I London: Kegan Paul, , pp, , , , , This text is part of the Internet Modern History Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history. Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright. Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational purposes and personal use.

If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook. Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action.


The Turkish Letters of Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq: A Biography

Early years[ edit ] He was born the illegitimate son of the Seigneur de Busbecq, Georges Ghiselin, and his mistress Catherine Hespiel, although he was later legitimized. Like his father and grandfather, Busbecq chose a career of public service. He started work in the court of the Austrian monarch Ferdinand I in approximately At the Ottoman court[ edit ] In and again in , [1] Ferdinand named him ambassador to the Ottoman Empire under the rule of Suleiman the Magnificent. His task for much of the time he was in Constantinople was the negotiation of a border treaty between his employer the future Holy Roman Emperor and the Sultan over the disputed territory of Transylvania. Cover page of Turcicae epistolae, ed. These letters describe his adventures in Ottoman politics and remain one of the principal primary sources for students of the 16th-century Ottoman court.


Augier Ghislain de Busbecq

Germain, near Rouen , France , Flemish diplomat and man of letters who, as ambassador to Constantinople now Istanbul , wrote informatively about Turkish life. Busbecq was the illegitimate son of the Seigneur de Busbecq and was later legitimated. On his second visit, Busbecq was placed under house arrest by the sultan, but he finally succeeded in framing peace terms that were ratified after his return to Vienna in After Ferdinand became emperor in , Busbecq held various positions at the imperial court. His letters were also long admired for their stylistic elegance and were regarded as models by later ambassadors. A man of lively interests, Busbecq collected Greek manuscripts later incorporated into the Austrian national collections , and he discovered the Monumentum Ancyranum ; the latter is an inscription engraved about 14 ce on the walls of a temple in ancient Ancyra modern Ankara , Tur. After meeting in Constantinople with two ambassadors from Crimea , Busbecq made, and included in one of his letters, the first list of words from a form of the Gothic language that was still used in that region.


Letters from Turkey



Search Results for "the-turkish-letters-of-ogier-ghiselin-de-busbecq"


Related Articles